Summary
This article is about the computer game called The Oregon Trail. Bigelow states that it is very informational and students learn a lot playing the game, but it is very biased. Although the number of men players and women players is about the same, apparently all the players go through the game as a man would have back in the 1800's. There is hardly any references to the decisions women had to make and no concern for the women's role at all. This also can be said for African American players in the game. Although the color of their skin is different, they are treated no different than the white men. As we all know, this is far from how reality was back then. According to Bigelow, the Oregon Trail simulation is both sexist and racist. It also teaches students to be selfish and put yourself first, even if it is at the expense of others or the earth. Bigelow believes that it does not allow for any moral or ethical values other than self success. It is the teachers job to analyze these computer software programs and teach our students to have a critical eye as well. Bigelow suggests some things teachers should think about before using software in their classrooms. These suggestions include questions about social groups, earth and non-human life, and ideology.
Reflection
At first when I was reading this article, I was actually a little annoyed. I thought to myself, "Really? It's a kid's game. Get over it." Then as I read some of Bigelow's explanations, I began to agree. I remember playing games like these in school. I'm not sure if it was the same one, but if not it was something very similar. Of course, I never thought about any of the cultural biases, I just thought it was fun! Bigelow brings up some good points though. I think this game would be great for students if it allowed them to choose the sex and race of their person and then lead them through a life that a person of that race and gender really would have had! Obviously, it would need to be appropriate, but the lifestyles of different people should be expressed more accurately. We don't want our students getting the wrong idea about how life was back then.
Jessica,
ReplyDeleteI remember when I was younger I thought this game was the funnies thing ever. Today I still think it was fun but I know see that there were a few things that could be improved with the game. I think if the game gave you the choice to pick your race and sex etc it would be a better educational product.
I really like how you suggested making a game where the students could make a profile that of their choosing, and follow the life that person might live. I think that would be a great way for students to learn about life back then. Like Bigelow said, kids get really connected and attached to their "life on the praire", so it has so much potential to be a great tool for us as teachers to use!
ReplyDeleteNice post, young lady!
Jessica, in reading your reflection I thought of another interesting question. You said, "Obviously, it would have to be appropriate." I wonder what that means to you? And I wonder what the developers of such programs think is/is not appropriate. Who would decide? I don't have an answer to this, just find it very interesting to ponder given the topic.
ReplyDeleteJessica-
ReplyDeleteI pretty much had the same reaction as you when I found out what this article was about. The Oregon Trail was one of the first computer games I ever played and absolutely none of the points the author complained about ever occured to me when I was playing it as a kid. Considering the age range the game is targeted for, I would actually be suprised if any of the concerns the author had about the game really ever affected the kids who play it. Although some valid points were made, I kind of feel like some of it was blown out of proportion.