Summary
This article discusses some of the goals of the NETS*T (standards regarding educational technology for teachers.) First some of the commonly misunderstood terms are explained; Assessment is the process of collecting data, analysis is organizing that data, and evaluation is making decisions based on the data collected. These three steps are essential to the decision-making process. The article also goes over the different uses of formative and summative evaluations. When a teacher collects formative data, they do so as the information is "forming." As the students are learning, the teacher conducts formative evaluations along the way to help make decisions on how to teach based on how well the students are learning. Summative evaluations, on the other hand, are usually conducted at the end of learning in order to "summarize" the students performance. This type of evaluation helps teachers know what to teach based on what their students know. Finally, the article distinguishes between the assessments we use and the assessment technologies that "support and enhance our methods" (pg 4). They discuss several different kinds of assessment technology tools incuding producing and creating measures, graphing, grading, and reporting, measuring specific skills and competencies-criterion referenced assessment, determining grade level performance and making normative comparisons, progress monitoring, performance assessment, and data warehouse aggregation.
Reflection
Wow, reading through this article brought one thing to mind: Assessment block! It follows me everywhere! I think it's a sign...this stuff is important! Everything about the decision-making process and formative/summative was mostly review. But the section on different kinds of assessment technologies was very interesting to me. It's amazing how much is out there. I realize now how important it is to research the different tools available because they have the potential to make our job so much easier! However, when discussing ways to determine grade level performance the Woodcock Johnson was mentioned. I hear so much conflicting information about this test! We are trained on how to administer it and then told that it is not very reliable or valid. I'm not quite sure what to think about this test...On the other hand, I was impressed with the different internet sources given and I will definitely be looking into those!